Peer Review Process
Commitment to Rigorous Peer Review
The peer-review process is designed to provide an objective academic assessment of submitted manuscripts. Reviews consider the manuscript's scientific contribution, methodological soundness, originality, clarity, relevance to the journal's scope, and quality of references.
Double-Blind Peer Review
Reviewer Confidentiality
The identities of reviewers and authors are handled confidentially during the review process to support independent academic assessment.
Independent Assessment
Reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive, and evidence-based recommendations without personal or inappropriate bias.
Editorial Independence
Final publication decisions remain the responsibility of the journal's editorial team based on the overall academic assessment.
Peer Review Workflow
Initial Submission
Authors submit their manuscripts through the OJS submission system in accordance with the journal's author guidelines and submission requirements.
Editorial Screening
The editorial team checks the manuscript for journal scope, basic academic quality, originality, formatting, completeness, and compliance with submission requirements.
Reviewer Selection
Suitable reviewers are selected according to the manuscript's subject area, expertise, and potential conflicts of interest.
Peer Review
The manuscript is evaluated by qualified reviewers. Reviewers assess the originality, significance, methodology, results, discussion, references, clarity, and overall scholarly contribution.
Editorial Decision
Based on the reviewer reports and editorial assessment, the manuscript may be accepted, returned for revision, rejected, or subject to further review.
Revision & Final Decision
Where revisions are required, authors respond to reviewer comments and submit a revised manuscript. The editor evaluates the revision and determines whether the manuscript is ready for publication.
Reviewer Assessment
Novelty and originality of the scholarly contribution.
Alignment with the scope and aims of JITSE.
Appropriateness and rigor of the research methods.
Validity, clarity, and interpretation of findings.
Quality of interpretation and connection with prior research.
Relevance, quality, and appropriate use of scholarly sources.
Clarity, structure, language, figures, tables, and overall presentation.
Compliance with relevant publication and research ethics.
Possible Editorial Decisions
Reviewer Responsibilities
Reviewers should evaluate manuscripts objectively, maintain confidentiality, disclose potential conflicts of interest, avoid inappropriate use of manuscript content, and provide constructive comments that can assist authors in improving their work.
Author Responsibilities
Authors are expected to respond appropriately to reviewer comments, provide revisions when requested, disclose relevant information, and ensure that submitted work complies with the journal's publication ethics requirements.
Confidentiality & Editorial Integrity
All manuscripts submitted to JITSE are handled confidentially. Editorial decisions are made independently based on scholarly quality, relevance, reviewer assessments, and compliance with the journal's editorial and publication ethics policies.
E-ISSN 3125-1048
Published by CV. Raskha Media Group
