Evaluating the Effectiveness of ChatGPT in Web-Based Information Systems: An Empirical Study on User Interaction and System Performance

Authors

  • Siti Khodijah Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Abil Alwi Prayoga Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62712/jitse.v1i1.4

Keywords:

ChatGPT, generative artificial intelligence, web-based information systems, user interaction, system performance

Abstract

The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence, particularly ChatGPT, has significantly transformed the landscape of web-based information systems by enabling more interactive, adaptive, and efficient user experiences. Despite its widespread adoption, empirical evidence evaluating its effectiveness in enhancing user interaction and system performance remains limited. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT integration within web-based information systems, focusing on its impact on user interaction quality and overall system performance. An empirical approach was employed using a quantitative research design, with data collected from users interacting with a ChatGPT-powered web system via structured questionnaires and system performance metrics. The analysis used statistical methods to examine the relationships between ChatGPT utilization, user engagement, response accuracy, and system efficiency. The findings indicate that ChatGPT significantly improves user interaction by providing faster responses, more natural communication, and higher engagement levels. Additionally, the integration of ChatGPT improves system performance, particularly response time and task completion efficiency, though minor limitations in contextual understanding and occasional inaccuracies persist. These results suggest that ChatGPT is a valuable component for enhancing the functionality of modern web-based systems. In conclusion, the study highlights the importance of integrating generative AI technologies to optimize digital system performance while emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring and refinement to address inherent limitations, thereby ensuring reliable and user-centered system development.

References

[1] Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 71, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.

[2] P. Ray, “ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope,” Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, vol. 3, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003.

[3] J. Kocoń et al., “ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none,” Information Fusion, vol. 99, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101861.

[4] M. Farrokhnia et al., “A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2023, doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846.

[5] M. Cascella et al., “Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare,” Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 47, 2023, doi:10.1007/s10916-023-01925-4.

[6] P. Korzynski et al., “Generative AI as a new context for management theories,” Central European Management Journal, 2023, doi:10.1108/CEMJ-02-2023-0091.

[7] V. Venkatesh et al., “Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 17, no. 5, 2021, doi:10.17705/1jais.00428.

[8] H. Hassani and E. S. Silva, “The role of ChatGPT in data science,” Big Data and Cognitive Computing, vol. 7, no. 2, 2023, doi:10.3390/bdcc7020062.

[9] S. S. Sohail et al., “Decoding ChatGPT: A taxonomy of existing research,” Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101675.

[10] Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 57, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.101994.

[11] W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “Information systems success measurement,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 2020, doi:10.1080/07421222.2020.1726136.

[12] A. Alkaissi and S. I. McFarlane, “Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT,” Cureus, vol. 15, 2023, doi:10.7759/cureus.35179.

[13] M. Sallam, “The utility of ChatGPT in healthcare education,” Healthcare, vol. 11, 2023, doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887.

[14] M. Javaid et al., “ChatGPT for healthcare services,” BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100105.

[15] J. Rudolph et al., “ChatGPT and academic integrity,” Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 2023, doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-19

How to Cite

Khodijah, S., & Prayoga, A. A. (2026). Evaluating the Effectiveness of ChatGPT in Web-Based Information Systems: An Empirical Study on User Interaction and System Performance. Journal of Information Technology and Systems Engineering, 1(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.62712/jitse.v1i1.4