Design and Implementation of a Web-Based Printing Service System Using UML and Waterfall: A Case Study of Business Process Optimization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62712/jitse.v1i1.1Keywords:
Web-based Information System, Printing Service, Business Process Optimization, ISO/IEC 25010, System Usability Scale (SUS)Abstract
The rapid advancement of information technology has encouraged service-based industries, including printing services, to adopt digital systems to improve operational efficiency and data accuracy. However, many small and medium-sized printing enterprises still rely on manual or semi-digital processes, leading to miscommunication, data inconsistencies, and inefficient workflow management. This study aims to design and implement a web-based printing service system using the Unified Modeling Language (UML) and the Waterfall development model to optimize business processes. A qualitative case study approach was employed, with data collected through observation, interviews, and documentation at CV. Rakha Media Group. The system integrates order management, inventory control, payment processing, and production workflow into a unified platform. System evaluation was conducted using Black-Box and White-Box testing, as well as ISO/IEC 25010 and the System Usability Scale (SUS). The results indicate that the system achieves a 100% functional success rate, a SUS score of 74.1 (good usability), and an overall quality score of 89% based on ISO 25010 evaluation. These findings demonstrate that the proposed system effectively reduces operational errors, improves communication between departments, and enhances overall efficiency. This study contributes both theoretically, by reinforcing the role of integrated information systems in business process optimization, and practically, by providing a scalable solution for digital transformation in printing service enterprises.
References
[1] J. Brooke, “SUS: A ‘Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale,” in Usability Evaluation in Industry, London, U.K.: CRC Press, 2020, doi: 10.1201/9781498710411
[2] A. Margherita, “Business process management system and digital transformation: A systematic review,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1485–1507, 2021, doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-03-2020-0120
[3] M. M. Queiroz and S. F. Wamba, “Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 52, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102099
[4] J. R. Lewis, “The System Usability Scale: Past, present, and future,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 577–590, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
[5] A. Alnanih, M. Ormandjieva, and T. Radhakrishnan, “Context-aware software quality model,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 169, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110537
[6] ISO/IEC, “ISO/IEC 25010: Systems and software engineering — Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE),” 2020
[7] R. M. Davison, M. G. Martinsons, and N. Kock, “Principles of digital transformation,” MIS Quarterly Executive, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2021
[8] H. Nugroho, A. Suryanto, and B. Prasetyo, “Evaluation of information system adoption in SMEs,” Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 127–137, 2021, doi: 10.20473/jisebi.7.2.127-137
[9] Y. Chen, X. Li, and J. Wang, “Data security in information systems: Challenges and solutions,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 107, pp. 102–110, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2020.02.012
[10] S. Verhoef et al., “Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 122, pp. 889–901, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
[11] V. Vial, “Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda,” MIS Quarterly Executive, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 118–144, 2020
[12] M. Ali, L. Zhou, and Z. Miller, “Web-based information systems for business process integration: A systematic review,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1021–1035, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10796-020-10045-3
[13] S. M. Salleh et al., “Digital transformation in SMEs: A systematic literature review,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13073845
[14] P. H. Nguyen et al., “Workflow automation in service systems: A performance perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 456–468, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2020.2977421
[15] L. R. Vijayasarathy, “The impact of coordination on operational performance,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 135, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113371
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Information Technology and Systems Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
